From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

If One Standard Is Good, Then Two Must Be Better 0

Daniel W. Drezner offers a theory as to why Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton seem to be held to two different standards of conduct by our corporate media. I’ll try my hand at a short version:

Well, everyone already knows Trump is corrupt! That’s old news–no need to report on that.

It’s her we have to look at.

Follow the link and decide for yourself whether my summary is accurate.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Resurrecting Reagan.

Share

“Secret Plans” 0

BadTux spills the secret:

The last time a Presidential candidate said he had a secret plan to end a war, it cost 25,000 American lives, the lives of half a million Laotians, Cambodians, and Vietnamese, roughly a trillion dollars in today’s money — and we lost anyhow . . . .

Share

How Stuff Works, Conservative Classification Dept. 0

Juanita Jean explains the difference between Trump supporters and Libertarians.

Share

Their Day in Court 0

The Bundy Bund goes to trial.

Share

The Apprentice 0

Matt Lauer says,


Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

His Word Is His Bondi 0

Via Raw Story.

Share

Drunk on Bircher Beer 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear details the resurgence of the Birchers.

Fun fact: The Koch Brothers come by it honestly. Their daddy was a big wheel in the John Birch Society.

Share

Bondi of Bothers 0

Title:  Trump's Quid Pro Quo.  Image:  Quid (Florida to review Trump U. allegations).  Pro ($25.000 donation to Florida A-G Pam Bondi).  Quo (Florisda takes no action against Trump U.).  Faux (Trump wearing halo says,


Click for the original image.

In related news, John Romano spins a tale.

Share

The Candidates Debate 0

I generally do not watch election returns or campaign circuses debates because I have better things to do with my time, like watch reruns of Murder She Wrote. They generally have less nutritional value than a Twinkie without the delicious creamy filling.

If anything of value happens, I can always read about them the next day.

Thankfully, Dick Polman has summarized last night’s Trumpalooza “forum” to prove to me that my decision to watch a rerun of The Bob Newhart Show was a correct and much more edifying decision. Here’s a snippet:

But the main event was Lauer’s abject subservience to Trump. Here’s the gist of what happened.

Q: Are you prepared to be commander-in-chief?

A: Absolutely!

Q: But are you really prepared to be commander-in-chief?

A: The best!

Q: Thank you sir, may I have another?

Share

Hack Journalism 0

Rex Huppke coughs up a column.

Share

Dress Rehearsal 0

Donald Trump says,


Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Two men stand outside


Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

A Missive from a Mainer 0

You can’t make this stuff up.

Afterthought:

I never expected to see so much stuff I couldn’t make up as I’ve seen this year . . . .

Share

Chris-Crossed 0

Image:  Concrete barricade labeled


Click for the original image.

Share

Up against the Wall 0

Of course, if LePage wasn’t such a jerk, some other outcome would have been likely, however it might have been spun.

Share

Samuel Johnson Was Right 0

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel In related news, David Niose questions attempts to “instill” patriotism. A snippet:

Knowing that group loyalty is a natural human inclination, we should consider why certain sectors of American society are so obsessed with trying to “instill” patriotism in us. Lawmakers in Missouri, for example, enacted a new law last week requiring recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at least once each day in public schools. (Note the “at least” in that last sentence—as if mere once-a-day pledge recitation might be insufficient!) Missouri is following the cue of other states around the country, believing that government (and sometimes private institutions) must take affirmative steps to condition citizens, via a steady flow of patriotic exercises, into the mental state of national allegiance.

Such conditioning is neither necessary nor healthy, and as a society we should rethink it. Just ask Colin Kaepernick, the NFL player who unleashed a public outcry after respectfully dissenting from the national anthem. For doing nothing more than sitting out a ceremonial song at the start of a football game, Kaepernick has been called a traitor and worse. Or ask Bradford Campeau-Laurion, who was once ejected from Yankee Stadium for having the audacity to use the seventh-inning stretch to visit the men’s room rather than sing “God Bless America.” Such hostile responses to mild gestures of dissent show not a healthy patriotism but an aggressive, chauvinistic nationalism.

Share

Left Uncovered 0

Dick Polman considers a story that he considers woefully underreported: An actual factual story, not a “cloud” of conjecture that “casts a shadow,” a story of cash on the barrel head.

Three years ago, the Donald J. Trump Foundation, the family’s nonprofit charity, gave a $25,000 campaign contribution to a group that flacked for Florida attorney general Pam Bondi. That donation was illegal, because nonprofits are barred by the IRS from giving money to political campaigns. And at the time the illegal donation was made, Bondi was deciding whether to go to bat for all the Floridians who had been allegedly bilked by the phony Trump University. Should she join the State of New York’s class action lawsuit, or not?

Trump’s foundation sent the money to Bondi. A month later, Bondi decided not to prosecute . . . .

Meanwhile, Josh Marshall points out that, when it comes to Donald Trump, the corporate media seems to think that his word is his Bondi:

I was curious to see whether there was any renewed attention to the Trump/Bondi story this morning. Alas, the answer appears to be: not really. There are some passing references to it. But it mainly seems limited to ‘This came up. Trump says it’s all good.’ And on to the next story.

Follow the links for more.

Share

Charitable Contributions 0

There’s a reason I mark the New York Times’s emails* trying to sell me a subscription as “spam.”

__________________

*I know how they got my old email address. I had the bad judgement to register for an account once, before I realized that any outfit that pays Tom Friedman money has no discernment. How they got my new one . . . .

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Twits who make stuff up.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.